The Hitchhiking Contributor’s Guide to Onboarding Docs in CI/CD
If you're like me, you'll be hitchhiking from one app to two different microservices, moving back and forth between two libraries, all in separate shared repositories, looking to make "guest code contributions" just before lunch. A common issue I face is repeatedly going through the onboarding process when switching repositories; unfortunately, the documented steps it takes are often outdated.
Crux of The Problem
It's common practice in many project repos to obfuscate development tasks & workflows behind a complex
Makefile or collect them in an extensive script list inside a
package.json. How often are those files your entry point for understanding how to do anything inside a repo? Are you sure they always work?
Projects that initially invested in building out contributing guides eventually become outdated as contributors change workflows without updating the developer documentation accordingly. This drift of docs and code does not just slow us down; it often causes outright frustration and contributor churn.
A CI/CD pipeline is not much different than any code contributor to your software project. It requires some prerequisites to set up and an entry shell command to run existing workflows like testing or deploying the app. What’s neat about pipelines is that they are a gateway for developers to ship code. If the project fails to build or tests fail, the CI/CD system turns red, preventing the code from floating under the radar and silently making it into the
Watch it live at https://github.com/stateful/vscode-runme/actions/workflows/test.yml
Use More Automation
Wouldn't it be nice if we could teach our automated CI/CD pipelines to harness our developer docs and follow the same exact steps as any new employee or contributor?
You might think this could be an excellent job for chatGPT, but no! Plain vanilla, yet powerful automation to the rescue! We can run snippets of code from within markdown files with Runme anywhere, no AI (yet! 😉).
What’s The Trick?
Consider the following
CONTRIBUTING.md (full file on GitHub):
See the name tags in raw markdown. 💡 Check out Runme for VS Code to ▶️ click and run them.
Pretty standard. Note the name tags in the code blocks, which help us to uniquely reference the command block via the Runme CLI. All we really need to do now is to run your CI/CD pipeline the same step a human contributor would; command-by-command following the documentation.
Putting It Into (GitHub) Action
To cut down on boilerplate, we've put together this handy GitHub Action for you to use inside your workflows like so:
name: Tests on: [push, pull_request] jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v3 - name: 🧪 Setup and Test with Runme uses: stateful/runme-action with: filename: CONTRIBUTING.md id: | configureNPM setup build test
Pre-built GitHub Action available at: https://github.com/stateful/runme-action/
That's it! We're done. Super simple. Instead of calling Makefiles targets or NPM scripts that remain undocumented and disconnected from your developer documentation, you can put your Markdown from and center of both humans and machines. Integration test dev-onboarding on every commit!
No more outdated developer docs. Unlock reliable onboarding bliss 🌈 for your repos!
If this is too simple of a showcase for your needs, hop on over to this end-to-end demo of a non-trivial CI/CD pipeline testing docs involving a Kubernetes cluster, a service mesh, and a small distributed application.
Before you go...To stay updated with our latest content, please subscribe to our email updates or follow us on Twitter at @runmedev! Also, check out Runme, a VS Code Extension that lets you run commands in READMEs with a click instead of tedious copy&pasting into a terminal.
Let us know what you think. Bye for now! 👋